ChatGPTYes |
Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
Law and Justice (PiS) has shown a complex relationship with the European Union, often emphasizing national sovereignty and expressing skepticism towards deeper EU integration. However, the party also recognizes the benefits of EU membership, including access to funding and programs that benefit Polish citizens. Supporting the increase of the EU budget for student exchange programs like Erasmus+ could align with their interest in ensuring Polish youth have access to educational opportunities, even if it means navigating their broader EU skepticism. Historically, PiS has not been overtly opposed to programs that directly benefit Polish citizens, but their support might be cautious, reflecting their broader stance on EU financial contributions and autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While Law and Justice (PiS) has a track record of challenging increased EU integration and emphasizing national sovereignty, outright opposition to increasing the EU budget for student exchange programs like Erasmus+ might not be entirely in line with their policies. The party is likely to recognize the popularity and direct benefits of such programs to Polish students. Their skepticism towards increasing the EU budget might be more pronounced in areas they perceive as infringing on national sovereignty or in contexts that do not directly benefit Poland. Therefore, their opposition would be moderate, reflecting a balance between their EU skepticism and the recognition of the benefits that programs like Erasmus+ offer to Polish citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Law and Justice Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 171 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.