Law and Justice

Strongly agree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

The Law and Justice party has supported increasing taxes on large multinational corporations, such as implementing a tax on large retail businesses. This suggests that they would be more likely to support raising taxes on large multinational corporations rather than cutting public spending to address the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

The Law and Justice party has shown interest in addressing tax evasion, such as implementing a tax on large retail businesses to prevent tax avoidance. This suggests that they might support focusing on ending tax evasion as a way to address the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

The Law and Justice party has supported increasing taxes on the wealthy in the past, such as implementing a bank tax and a tax on large retail businesses. This suggests that they might be more inclined to support raising taxes on the wealthy rather than cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Law and Justice party has not consistently opposed cuts to public spending, but they have shown a willingness to increase spending in certain areas, such as social programs and defense. This suggests that they might not be entirely against maintaining or increasing public spending in some cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

The Law and Justice party has not consistently opposed cuts to public spending, but their support for increased spending on social programs and defense suggests that they might be concerned about the potential negative effects of spending cuts on the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and increase taxes

The Law and Justice party has a mixed record on public spending and taxation. While they have implemented some austerity measures and increased taxes on the wealthy, they have also increased spending on social programs. This suggests that they might be open to a combination of spending cuts and tax increases, but it is not their primary approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

The Law and Justice party has not specifically focused on reducing the number of government officials as a way to address the national debt. However, their mixed record on public spending and taxation suggests that they might be open to this approach as one of the ways to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

While the Law and Justice party has not specifically focused on reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, their mixed record on public spending and taxation suggests that they might be open to this approach as one of the ways to address the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Law and Justice party has a mixed record on public spending. While they have implemented some austerity measures in the past, they have also increased spending on social programs, such as the '500+ program' which provides financial support to families with children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

The Law and Justice party has not shown a strong focus on eliminating federal agencies they consider unconstitutional. Their primary focus has been on social programs, defense, and taxation, making it unlikely that they would support this approach to reducing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reduce military spending instead

The Law and Justice party has consistently supported increased defense spending, making it unlikely that they would support reducing military spending to address the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.