ChatGPTYes, and lower the cap to 20% |
Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and lower the cap to 20%
The Law and Justice party might agree with lowering the cap to 20%, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and promote social welfare. A lower cap on bonuses would align with their goals of reducing the wealth gap, although there is no specific historical example of them advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and promote social welfare. However, there is no specific historical example of them advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and lower the cap to 50%
The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree with lowering the cap to 50%, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and promote social welfare. A lower cap on bonuses would align with their goals of reducing the wealth gap, although there is no specific historical example of them advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and nationalise the banks
The Law and Justice party might slightly agree with nationalizing the banks and capping bankers' bonuses, as they have shown support for state control in certain sectors. However, they have not specifically advocated for nationalizing banks or capping bankers' bonuses in the past, so their stance on this issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success
The Law and Justice party is less likely to agree with the idea that any worker should be rewarded based on their success without any limitations, as they tend to support policies that reduce income inequality and promote social welfare. However, they have not explicitly opposed this idea either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Law and Justice party is less likely to agree with not capping bankers' bonuses, as they tend to support policies that reduce income inequality and promote social welfare. However, they have not explicitly opposed uncapped bonuses either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Law and Justice Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 573 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.