Law and Justice

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The Law and Justice party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They have a strong focus on national security and sovereignty, and would likely support whistleblower protections that do not compromise these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their emphasis on law and order. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers who act within the law, but not for those who obtain information illegally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The Law and Justice party might agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a compromise between protecting whistleblowers and maintaining order and security. However, there is no specific historical evidence to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Law and Justice party has not made a clear stance on the issue of whistleblower protection. While they may support the idea in theory, their actions in government suggest a more nuanced view, particularly when it comes to whistleblowers who reveal information that is damaging to the party or its interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly opposed whistleblower protection, they have been criticized for their handling of whistleblowers in the past. However, it's unlikely they would outright oppose such laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.