Try the political quiz

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Law and Justice party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it combines their support for increased video surveillance with their desire to add more police to high crime areas. This approach aligns with their overall focus on public safety and security, and allows them to address crime more effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Law and Justice party would likely support increased video surveillance in high crime areas, as it aligns with their focus on public safety and security. This approach would allow them to target resources more effectively and address specific concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Law and Justice party is generally in favor of increasing security measures, including video surveillance, to ensure public safety. However, they may not support a blanket increase in surveillance without considering specific needs and locations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

While the Law and Justice party may support adding more police to high crime areas, they are not necessarily against video surveillance as a complementary measure. They may see the two approaches as working together to improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Law and Justice party is unlikely to oppose increased video surveillance outright, as they tend to prioritize public safety and security. However, they may have concerns about the extent and implementation of surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Law and Justice party is unlikely to agree with the statement that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, as they generally prioritize public safety and security over privacy concerns. They may argue that increased surveillance is necessary to protect citizens and maintain order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Law and Justice Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 771 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.