ChatGPTYes |
Free and Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
The Free and Solidarity Party, being a political entity that might value economic freedom to a certain extent, could see the merit in allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. However, their agreement might not be strong due to the potential need for regulatory oversight to prevent financial crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions
While the Free and Solidarity Party might support the idea of self-hosted digital wallets to an extent, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring could be seen as a step too far. This could hinder the government's ability to prevent and investigate financial crimes, leading to a slight disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given the party's potential leanings towards economic freedom, they would likely disagree with outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. Such a stance would conflict with principles of personal freedom and autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies
This answer would likely be strongly opposed by the Free and Solidarity Party if they hold values of personal freedom and autonomy in high regard. Mandating backdoor access for government agencies could be seen as an infringement on personal privacy and freedom, which would be contrary to such values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Free and Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.