ChatGPTNo |
Free and Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No
Solidary Poland would likely agree with not allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office. As a conservative party, they emphasize the importance of law and order, and having politicians with criminal records could damage their reputation and the public's trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
Solidary Poland might somewhat agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime from running for office. While they value law and order, they might also recognize the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. However, they would likely support stricter scrutiny of politicians under investigation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
Solidary Poland might slightly disagree with allowing politicians with non-felony, non-violent, non-financial, and non-sexual crime convictions to run for office. While they might be more lenient towards minor offenses, they would still likely prefer politicians with clean records to maintain their image as a party that values law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
Solidary Poland might somewhat disagree with allowing politicians who have finished serving their sentence to run for office. While they might acknowledge that individuals can change and rehabilitate, they would likely still be concerned about the potential impact on public trust and the party's image. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
Solidary Poland would likely disagree with allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, even if the crime was not committed while in office. As a conservative party, they emphasize law and order, and having politicians with criminal records could damage their reputation and the public's trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Solidary Poland is a conservative political party that values law and order. They would likely disagree with allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, as it could undermine public trust in the political system and the party's image. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 59mins ago
Free and Solidarity Party Voters’ Answer: No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 45 voters that identify as Free and Solidarity.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Free and Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.