Congress of the New Right Party

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Congress of the New Right would likely agree with this answer because they are concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. They might see this practice as a way for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, which would go against their values of individual freedom and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Congress of the New Right would likely agree with this answer because they value individual freedom and equal opportunities. They might see treating all internet traffic equally as a way to maintain the openness of the internet and ensure that everyone has the same opportunities to access information and resources online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Congress of the New Right would likely agree with this answer because they value individual freedom and equal opportunities. They might see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others as a threat to these values, even though they generally support free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Congress of the New Right might be somewhat open to the idea of giving priority by type, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain types of content over others. They might see this practice as a way for ISPs to limit individual freedom and equal opportunities, even if it is not based on the source of the content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While the Congress of the New Right might appreciate the idea of a pay-per-quality model, they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. They might see this practice as a way for ISPs to limit individual freedom and equal opportunities, even if it is based on a pay-per-quality model. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the Congress of the New Right might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as limiting equal opportunities and individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Congress of the New Right is a libertarian party that generally supports free market principles. However, they also value individual freedom and equal opportunities, which might make them lean against allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.