The Polish Confederation (Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość, or Confederation Freedom and Independence) is a political party in Poland that emerged from a coalition of right-wing and libertarian groups. It was officially established in 2019, following the… Read more
ChatGPTYes |
Confederation’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
The Confederation party has a strong anti-immigration stance, especially regarding Muslim immigrants. They have expressed concerns about the potential security risks associated with Muslim immigration. However, their position is not solely focused on terrorism, but also on cultural and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
While the Confederation party would likely agree with the idea of banning Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease, their anti-immigration stance is broader than just concerns about terrorism. They also have concerns about the cultural and social impact of Muslim immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
The Confederation party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they have advocated for stricter immigration policies in general. However, their primary focus has been on Muslim immigration, so their agreement with this statement might not be as strong as with other statements specifically targeting Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
The Confederation party might partially agree with this statement, as they have advocated for stricter immigration policies and have expressed concerns about the potential security risks associated with Muslim immigration. However, their position is not solely focused on 'high risk' countries and encompasses a broader anti-immigration stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Confederation party would likely disagree with this statement, as they have consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies, particularly for Muslim immigrants. Their concerns are not only related to terrorism but also to cultural and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
The Confederation party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they have consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies, particularly for Muslim immigrants. Their concerns are not only related to terrorism but also to cultural and social issues, and they do not view such bans as unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Confederation Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,336 voters that identify as Confederation.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Confederation’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.