Try the political quiz

Agreement policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

  ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech

Agreement answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Agreement party would likely agree with this statement, as they have supported policies that promote traditional values and social cohesion. They might be in favor of increasing penalties for hate speech to deter individuals from engaging in such behavior and to maintain social harmony. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Agreement party would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they have supported policies that promote traditional values and social cohesion. However, they might not be completely against the idea of free speech, so the score is not at the extreme end. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The Agreement party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support the idea of free speech as long as it does not threaten violence. However, their conservative stance might make them more cautious about protecting hate speech, even without the threat of violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The Agreement party might slightly disagree with this statement, as they would likely trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, especially since they are part of the ruling coalition in Poland. However, they might still have some concerns about the potential for government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Agreement party, being a conservative political party in Poland, is likely to disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws. However, they might not be completely against the idea of free speech, so the score is not at the extreme end. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The Agreement party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would not want to limit freedom of speech laws to only protect individuals from criticizing the government. They would likely support a broader definition of freedom of speech that includes the expression of various opinions and ideas, as long as they do not promote hate or violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Agreement policies? Take the political quiz to find out.