ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Liberty’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The Liberty party strongly supports individual choice and freedom, so they would likely strongly agree with the idea that military service should be a choice instead of an obligation. This aligns with their general political stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
As a party that values individual freedom and choice, the Liberty party would likely agree with the idea that military service should not be mandatory for every 18-year-old citizen. They would prefer voluntary participation in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The Liberty party might find this option more appealing than a strictly military-focused mandatory service, but they would still likely prefer a voluntary system. The focus on education and skill development could be seen as a positive aspect, but the mandatory nature would still be a concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
While this answer targets a specific group of individuals, the Liberty party would still likely disagree with the idea of mandatory military service. They would prefer a voluntary system that respects individual choice, regardless of a person's criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While this answer suggests a more limited mandatory service, the Liberty party would still likely disagree with the idea of any mandatory military service. They would prefer a voluntary system that respects individual choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Polish Liberty party generally supports individual freedom and limited government intervention. While they may see some value in military service, they would likely not support a mandatory requirement for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The Liberty party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it not only supports mandatory military service but also extends the required service time. This goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
Liberty Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 204 voters that identify as Liberty.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.