Law and Justice

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support conservative values and national interests. They might be concerned that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would harm local businesses and content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support conservative values and national interests. They might be in favor of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet to protect local businesses and content providers from being disadvantaged by larger, wealthier competitors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, their conservative values and focus on national interests suggest they would likely support equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This would help protect local businesses and content providers from being disadvantaged by larger, wealthier competitors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, but their conservative values and focus on national interests suggest they would likely prioritize equal access to the internet over allowing ISPs to give priority by type. They might be concerned that this could still disadvantage local businesses and content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, but their conservative values and focus on national interests suggest they would likely prioritize equal access to the internet over allowing ISPs to implement a pay-per-quality model. They might be concerned that this could still disadvantage local businesses and content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, but their conservative values and focus on national interests suggest they would likely prioritize equal access to the internet over potential improvements in speed and reliability for users. They might be concerned that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites could harm local businesses and content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, but they generally support conservative values and national interests. They might not be in favor of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it could harm local businesses and content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.