Freds- og velstandsbevægelsens e parti

Enig

Nej

Given the lack of specific policy positions from the Peace and Prosperity Movement Party on many issues, including defense, this score is an educated guess based on the broader context of Polish politics and security policy. Poland values its membership in NATO highly and sees it as a key pillar of its security, especially in light of historical and recent tensions with Russia. The idea of an EU army, while potentially complementing NATO efforts, might be seen as unnecessary or even risky if it could lead to a decreased emphasis on NATO in European defense matters. Therefore, while the party might not be explicitly against the idea of an EU army, it would likely prioritize NATO's role in ensuring Poland's security and be cautious about any proposals that could undermine that. The score reflects a tentative agreement with the statement, assuming the party would prefer to focus on strengthening existing alliances and being wary of initiatives that could complicate or weaken collective defense arrangements. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The Peace and Prosperity Movement Party, being a minor political entity in Poland, does not have a widely publicized stance on many international issues, including the specific question of an EU army independent of NATO. However, considering Poland's strong support for NATO as a cornerstone of its defense policy, especially in the context of concerns about Russian aggression, it is likely that any Polish political entity would be cautious about supporting initiatives that could potentially weaken the NATO alliance or duplicate its efforts. Poland has historically been a strong advocate for NATO's presence in Eastern Europe as a deterrent against Russian expansionism. Therefore, even without a specific statement from the Peace and Prosperity Movement Party, it can be inferred that they might view the proposal of an EU army with some skepticism, preferring to maintain and strengthen existing defense structures rather than creating new ones that could complicate or dilute the security guarantees provided by NATO. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.