Lov og Retfærdighed

Enig

Ja

Law and Justice (PiS) has shown some support for policies that could reduce pollution and improve public transportation, as seen in their investments in public transport infrastructure and support for electric vehicles. However, their focus tends to be more on national interests and traditional values rather than on progressive environmental policies. Supporting carpooling and shared transportation services could align with their interest in reducing pollution and improving urban mobility, but it might not be their top priority. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

While Law and Justice (PiS) might not directly oppose the idea of providing incentives for carpooling and the use of shared transportation services, their policy focus tends to lean towards supporting traditional industries and infrastructural development over explicitly promoting shared or sustainable transportation methods. Their approach to governance suggests a preference for solutions that bolster economic growth and national sovereignty, which might not always align with incentivizing shared transportation services. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.