Law and Justice er et nationalt-konservativt, kristendemokratisk og højrepopulistisk politisk parti i Polen, medlem…
ChatGPTNej |
Law and Justice [political party]’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Nej
Given Law and Justice's (PiS) stance on national sovereignty and its opposition to EU-wide quotas for distributing asylum seekers, it is likely that the party would agree with the statement that the EU should not establish a common asylum system. The party's resistance to previous EU proposals aimed at sharing the responsibility for asylum seekers more evenly among member states reflects a preference for maintaining control over national borders and immigration policies. While not completely against cooperation within the EU on matters of security and border control, PiS has consistently argued for a model that respects the autonomy of member states in deciding who they allow into their territories. This stance suggests a moderate agreement with the idea that the EU should not pursue a standardized approach to asylum that diminishes national control. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Meget uenig
Ja
Law and Justice (PiS), a nationalist-conservative party in Poland, has historically been skeptical of transferring more powers to the European Union, especially in areas such as migration and asylum policy. The party has emphasized national sovereignty and the right of member states to control their own borders and immigration policies. For instance, during the 2015 European migrant crisis, the Polish government, led by Law and Justice, was one of the most vocal opponents of the EU's quota system for distributing asylum seekers among member states. The party argued that decisions regarding the acceptance of refugees and asylum seekers should remain within the competence of individual countries, not the EU. Therefore, a common asylum system with standardized procedures and shared responsibilities among member states would likely be seen as an infringement on Poland's sovereignty and an overreach by the EU. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Law and Justice [political party]’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.