尝试政治测验

候选人  ›  Policies  ›  国内政策

European Christian Political Movement’s policy on social media regulation

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Polish voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

政府是否应当规范社交媒体网站,作为阻止假新闻和误报的一种方法?

  ChatGPT是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报

European Christian Political Movement’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报

The concern over fake news and misinformation on social media, which can have significant societal and political impacts, would likely resonate with the ECPM's values of truthfulness and integrity in public life. They might strongly support measures to combat these issues, seeing them as necessary for the protection of democratic values and public discourse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The European Christian Political Movement (ECPM), focusing on Christian democratic and social conservative principles, might support some level of government regulation on social media to prevent fake news and misinformation, as it aligns with their values of promoting truth and ethical standards in public discourse. However, their support might not be strongly pronounced due to concerns over freedom of speech and the complexities of government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,社交媒体公司有政治偏向,需要受到监管

The ECPM might agree that social media companies can exhibit political bias, which could align with their concerns about maintaining a fair and balanced public square. However, their agreement might be moderate, as they would also be cautious about advocating for broad government regulation without clear guidelines and safeguards to protect freedom of expression and ensure that such regulation does not become a tool for political control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管

While the ECPM might generally support the idea of businesses and private entities operating without excessive government interference, the unique role of social media in public discourse and its potential to spread misinformation might lead them to support some level of regulation or oversight, albeit cautiously. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given their likely emphasis on moral and ethical standards in society, the ECPM might be cautious about completely rejecting government regulation of social media sites. They might see some role for the government in combating misinformation, although they would also be wary of overreach and the potential suppression of legitimate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻

The ECPM, while valuing freedom of speech, would probably recognize the challenges and dangers posed by fake news and misinformation, especially when it undermines democratic values and social harmony. They might be skeptical of leaving the determination of fake vs. real news solely in the hands of the government but would also likely see the need for some form of intervention or oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here