Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
J>J Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Social › Gay Marriage
J>J Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
Science › Nuclear Energy
J>J Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
the Economy › Welfare
J>J Personal answerFewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
J>J Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Elections › Mental competency testing
J>J Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
J>J Personal answerYes, and make it a living wage |
Healthcare › COVID Employment Health Pass
J>J Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
J>J Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
J>J Personal answerDecrease |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
J>J Personal answerYes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
J>J Personal answerIt Depends. If they have finished serving their sentence (for a minor crime (e.g., protesting)), then-Yes. However, if A. the crime was committed while in office & B. it was a felony, violent, financial, sexual, etc., crime, then-No. Still, we should disallow politicians that are OR get put under investigation for a crime, whether before OR while running for office. |
Social › Gender Transition
J>J Personal answerYes, just as long as the person under the age of 18 years old fully understands the choice of this irreversible life decision |
Social › Euthanasia
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
Social › Death Penalty
J>J Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, because too many people are innocently convicted. Plus, I think that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence because the dead don't suffer unless their soul was sent to hell that is. |
Immigration › High Risk Immigrant Ban
J>J Personal answerNo, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
J>J Personal answerYes, but only for deadly contagious diseases |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
J>J Personal answerNo because this would increase the risk of accidental shootings, therefore schools should hire trained professional security guards. |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine and Nato
J>J Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
J>J Personal answerYes, and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations, and lower taxes for the poor. |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
the Economy › Government Pensions
J>J Personal answerYes, and adjust them yearly so that retired government workers can receive an income to cover the basic necessities including food and housing |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
J>J Personal answerNo, but drastically increase taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
J>J Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Healthcare › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
J>J Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Spending
J>J Personal answerNo, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
J>J Personal answerNo. However the sentence should depend on why the person was trafficking drugs in the first place. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
J>J Personal answerYes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
J>J Personal answerYes. However, it should only cover very basic and simple topics, but if they want to, then they can be allowed to take a test that tests more than just a basic level of understanding |
the Environment › Animal Testing
J>J Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
J>J Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for between 5 - 10 years, and even then, they will only be allowed to vote only in local elections, until they become full-fledged citizens of the United States |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
J>J Personal answerNo, immigrants should choose whether they want to learn English OR Not, and for those that do, the government should provide them with free language learning courses, but Personally, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country. |
the Economy › Four-day Workweek
J>J Personal answerYes |
Social › Transgender Athletes
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
J>J Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech, but even though I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so. Plus, it Personally believe that it has now become just a piece of cloth that doesn’t represent what it should anymore, because America is an Oligarchy and NOT a Democracy |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
J>J Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health
J>J Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
J>J Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations because of the abuse of loopholes in order to evade taxes. |
Social › Hate Speech
J>J Personal answerAt this point, I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, but it should all depend on the circumstances. Yes, a person’s hate speech can be protected by the first amendment, just as long as it does not encourage people to commit acts of violence against others. Still, I (personally) believe that the freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
J>J Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
J>J Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
J>J Personal answerNo, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
J>J Personal answerYes, but only for medical use, and A. immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses, & B. legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it. |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
J>J Personal answerRaise for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses while eliminating deductions and loop holes. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
J>J Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs, and we should also retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
J>J Personal answerNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
J>J Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material |
Social › Women in Combat
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men because preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
Foreign Policy › Taliban Financial Aid
J>J Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
J>J Personal answerNo, because these types of donations just turn into bribes from corporations, but allow donations from unions and non-profits, since (I think) they don't have a record of bribing political parties |
Transportation › Public Transportation
J>J Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
the Economy › Labor Unions
J>J Personal answerHelp |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
J>J Personal answerIncrease, but only for countries with no human rights violations/countries that are legitimately trying to improve and modernize. |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
J>J Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
J>J Personal answerYes, drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
J>J Personal answerNo, they should be instead captured, (humanly) interrogated, given a fair trial, and imprisoned instead because assassinating suspected terrorists can pose a real Public Relations problem for us, whether they are guilty OR NOT. |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
J>J Personal answerDecrease, companies are currently taking advantage of this program to decrease wages |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
J>J Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
Domestic Policy › TikTok Ban
J>J Personal answerYes & No, because Banning TikTok is a violation of free speech, but at the same time, we should do more to stop China from collecting data on our citizens. |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
J>J Personal answerYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone and private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare. This should be in form of tax and should not be that expensive. |
the Economy › Tariffs
J>J Personal answerNo, this will hurt our manufacturing businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
J>J Personal answerNo, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
J>J Personal answerNo, but they should be given the option to remove the ad if the information in it is all false [and/or] misleading |
the Economy › Cryptocurrency
J>J Personal answerNo, because the level of unpredictability makes cryptocurrency simply untenable = flawed |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
J>J Personal answerYes, even though officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption |
the Environment › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if they use renewable energy sources |
the Economy › Decentralized Finance
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
J>J Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes,but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
J>J Personal answerNo, higher agencies should handle extreme situations with specialized training and equipment. However, if police departments are given strict training on how and when to use the equipment, and will only use military-grade equipment in response to extreme situations like the higher agencies with specialized training and equipment, then Yes. |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
J>J Personal answerYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis while under house arrest using an electronic bracelet. |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
J>J Personal answerYes, unless they have committed a very serious crime OR an act of terrorism |
Crime › Defunding the Police
J>J Personal answerYes, but the funding for local police departments and social & community-based programs should be split equally. However, for police departments in higher crime rate communities, then the funding and training should increase. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
J>J Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
Foreign Policy › Gaza ceasefire
J>J Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
J>J Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
the Economy › State Ownership
J>J Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
Crime › Private Prisons
J>J Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Social › Niqāb
J>J Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member, just in case. |
Foreign Policy › Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine
J>J Personal answerYes, until Israel and Palestine can Peacefully coexist with each other, then I want to propose for My Idea called Holy Land Reunification (German: Wiedervereinigung des Heiligen Landes, Russian: Воссоединение Святой Земли, Korean: 성지통일, Swahili: Kuunganishwa tena kwa Ardhi Takatifu, Chinese (Simplified): 圣地统一, Chinese (Traditional): 聖地統一, Spanish: Reunificación de Tierra Santa, Portuguese: Reunificação da Terra Santa, French: Réunification de la Terre Sainte, Greek: Επανένωση των Αγίων Τόπων, Latin: Terra Sancta Reunificatio, Hebrew: איחוד ארץ הקודש, Arabic: إعادة توحيد الأراضي المقدسة, Persian: اتحاد مجدد سرزمین مقدس) is the potential unification of the modern State of Israel and the State of Palestine into a single sovereign state, without both firing a shot & shedding a Drop of Blood, that everyone in both countries agree to. |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine
J>J Personal answerNo, because that could Risk starting World War III, which could then evolve into a Nuclear War, which will end in Nuclear Armageddon aka a Nuclear Holocaust, resulting in the end of the world |
the Environment › Fracking
J>J Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Foreign Policy › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
J>J Personal answerBoth Equally, to a degree, but if I had to choose only one, then I would say that I sympathize with Palestine more because of how Innocent People of Gaza are Victims of Israeli War Crimes? |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.