In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the…
Read moreStatistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 558 Anti-Islam voters.
41% Yes |
59% No |
35% Yes |
50% No |
3% Yes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated |
5% No, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
2% Yes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media |
4% No, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 558 Anti-Islam voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 558 Anti-Islam voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Anti-Islam voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9G7HGN41yr1Y
if social media are regulated by the government, the government itself could share misinformation or fake new which are to his advantage.
@9CBBYD51yr1Y
No because they could potentially use this to spread their own fake news and misinformation
@996ZJ3S2yrs2Y
The government propagates fake news
@97BYXVP2yrs2Y
Yes, but only regarding public safety (vaccines, politics, etc.)
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.
