5 U.S. states have passed laws requiring welfare recipients to be tested for drugs. Proponents argue that testing will prevent public funds from being used to subsidize drugs habits and help get treatment for those that are addicted to drugs. Opponents argue that it is a waste of money since the tests will cost more money than they save.
21% Yes |
76% No |
15% Yes |
72% No |
3% Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
2% No, this is a waste of time and money |
2% Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians |
2% No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
2% Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
See how support for each position on “Welfare Drug Testing” has changed over time for 2.7k Poland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Welfare Drug Testing” has changed over time for 2.7k Poland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Poland users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Explore other topics that are important to Poland voters.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)