Law and Justice

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

The Law and Justice party has shown support for environmentally friendly solutions, such as promoting electric buses in Polish cities. They have also supported the development of renewable energy sources. Therefore, they would likely agree with increasing spending on public transportation if it goes towards environmentally friendly solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Law and Justice party has shown some support for increasing spending on public transportation, especially in the context of infrastructure development. For example, they have supported the construction of the Central Communication Port, which includes railway connections. However, their focus is not solely on public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and provide more free public transportation

The Law and Justice party has not strongly advocated for providing more free public transportation, but they have shown support for improving public transportation services and infrastructure. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we have more important issues that need funding

While the Law and Justice party has other priorities, such as social welfare programs and defense spending, they have not explicitly stated that public transportation is a less important issue. Therefore, their stance on this statement is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly stated that they are satisfied with the current amount of spending on public transportation, they have supported some infrastructure projects that include public transportation. Therefore, they would likely slightly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should privatize more public transportation services

The Law and Justice party has not shown strong support for privatizing public transportation services. They have focused more on infrastructure development and environmentally friendly solutions. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Law and Justice party has not been strongly against increasing spending on public transportation, as they have supported some infrastructure projects that include public transportation. However, their focus is not solely on public transportation, so they would not strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should reduce current spending

The Law and Justice party has not advocated for reducing current spending on public transportation. Instead, they have supported some infrastructure projects that include public transportation, such as the Central Communication Port. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.