Law and Justice

Strongly agree

Yes

Law and Justice (PiS) has historically supported policies that enhance state security and public order, viewing them as essential to national sovereignty and the well-being of its citizens. The party has implemented and proposed various measures to strengthen border security, combat terrorism, and reduce crime. A national identification system could be seen as a continuation of these efforts, aligning with their emphasis on security and fraud prevention. However, the score is not a full 5 because there might be considerations regarding privacy and civil liberties that could temper their support slightly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Law and Justice's track record of supporting increased security measures and their focus on national sovereignty, it is unlikely they would oppose a national identification system intended to enhance security and prevent fraud. Their policies generally favor stronger state control and oversight in areas related to security and public order. Opposition to such a system would contradict their established stance on security and fraud prevention, making it unlikely for them to strongly disagree with the implementation of a national identification system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.