@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@842VWLK2yrs2Y
yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
@7VRTYM52yrs2Y
Yes, but only less important animals.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.
@93GLTS32yrs2Y
Yes, unless the animals go through pain.
@93FNHSZ2yrs2Y
Yes as long as it’s not cruel and inhumane
@LiamHal786386402yrs2Y
Yes and allow human testing
@9334YP32yrs2Y
Yes, but only after testing on themselves first.
@932GCCP2yrs2Y
Yes, but only things like rats and stuff
@92XHX9V2yrs2Y
as long as they are not harmed
@92W2JVT2yrs2Y
No, and it should have a consequence (jail)
@92T53D92yrs2Y
Yes, but strictly rodents
@92PFG4M2yrs2Y
Its a bad thing to not hurt animals
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species
@8ZY28ML2yrs2Y
yes only for rats though
@8ZY2C692yrs2Y
Only if its a pointless animal.
@8M258QP2yrs2Y
No- prisoners should elect to be able to par take in this testing rather than animals if they are on death row- joining this program would halt death row.
@8ZLFQSG2yrs2Y
Yes, but not if it’ll harm the animal
@8ZMSVTB2yrs2Y
Yes, but only on non-intelligent animals
@5BMX4XT2yrs2Y
Yes for safety of drugs, caccines & medical devices. Not for cosmetics nor cosmetic surgeries.
@8ZLFQJW2yrs2Y
As long as it’s not inhumane
@8ZMD43W2yrs2Y
@8ZGG8TM2yrs2Y
As long as it stays to maybe just rats and overpopulated rodents
@8ZGPKM92yrs2Y
no because we need animals or the natural and if they get killed then what are we gonna do and animals have completely different dna so it would not help us at all
@85QWNPG2yrs2Y
Yes, with riggorous oversight to maintain fair treatment for the animals in these situations.
@7NHW7HN2yrs2Y
Yes, but not for the cosmetics, and not excessively
@8Y6XX9F2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as animals aren't cruelly treated.
@8VHBC3L2yrs2Y
No, all life is precious
@jasonandrewdevine2yrs2Y
Hell No, Dr. Fauci, you sicko!
@8YTF5WC2yrs2Y
No because it might work on a animal but it could be harmful to humans.
@88LK76J2yrs2Y
No test on convicted murders
@8YTK56X2yrs2Y
No, animals should be a beautiful part of nature, not a science experiment that only benefits humans.
@8YRGX822yrs2Y
As long as the animals do not get harmed long term. There should always be a limit.
@8YT6ZJX2yrs2Y
If they are about to die yes
@8YN5FVP2yrs2Y
Yes, but only for non-mammals.
@8YK8W8V2yrs2Y
No, this is animal cruelty and it shouldn't be towards others living things just because they can't do anything about it.
@8YDDPK22yrs2Y
No, if it goes wrong then you are just killing an innocent animal
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...