Lov og Retfærdighed

Meget enig

Ja

Law and Justice (PiS) has historically supported policies that enhance state security and public order, viewing them as essential to national sovereignty and the well-being of its citizens. The party has implemented and proposed various measures to strengthen border security, combat terrorism, and reduce crime. A national identification system could be seen as a continuation of these efforts, aligning with their emphasis on security and fraud prevention. However, the score is not a full 5 because there might be considerations regarding privacy and civil liberties that could temper their support slightly. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Given Law and Justice's track record of supporting increased security measures and their focus on national sovereignty, it is unlikely they would oppose a national identification system intended to enhance security and prevent fraud. Their policies generally favor stronger state control and oversight in areas related to security and public order. Opposition to such a system would contradict their established stance on security and fraud prevention, making it unlikely for them to strongly disagree with the implementation of a national identification system. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.